Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFYI BCC Presentation Transition, Planning Growth 1.11.2022 ps COON, Ahm `<'' ilT Y A UT NO* a Ca Clay County Utility Authority 2, Transition, Planning, Growth Agenda • The CCUATeam • Organizational Transition • Strategic Planning �\ pv cov,�,l` > Updated Mission Statement �t� ➢Work Force Development and Training➢ Integrated Water Resource Plan G , "CPO --• 0 > Rate Study ��/TygUTHO4S1� COUNT` � Executive Director: Jeremy D. Johnston, PE, MBA 01141101 'e/TYAUTNO�`� Chief Operations Officer: Teri Shoemaker, PE Senior Leadership Chief Financial Officer: Jeffrey Wesselman, CPA Team Chief Engineer: Paul Steinbrecher, PE Chief Human Resources Officer: Kimberly Richardson Organizational Small Utility Medium Utility Large Utility • Population served is less than • Population served is between • Population served is over 50,00o people 50,00o and ioo,000 people ioo,000 people • Can be driven by individuals • Requires standardization of • Requires high levels of processes, procedures, and teamwork up, down, and • Minimal standards protocols. across the organization • Minimal structure • Organization structure • Processes, procedures, • Less revenue compared to becomes essential protocols must be highly capital investment • Growing need for specialized standardized areas of knowledge and • Specialized areas of expertise knowledge and expertise become essential Organizational ...,, Board of Supervisors 1 Executive Director 4, i 1 Chief Financial Chief Engineer Chief Operations Chief Human Officer Officer Resources Officer Public and Govt. -► Asst. Chief Financial Assistant Chief Gen. Super.Water _ Risk and Safety Affairs Liaison Officer Engineer Treatment Manager -► Customer Service Service Availability Gen. Super. and Billing Mgr. Manager Wastewater Treat. The organizational structure reflects the -► Procurement Construction & Gen. Super. Dist. g o Manager Inspection Mgr. And Collection core disciplines of Finance, Engineering, Env. Compliance Operations, and Human Resources/Risk Inventory Control GIS/Asset p Manager Mgr./Survey Mgr. Manager Management. Information Systems _, Facilities Manager Manager SCADA Manager ARisk and Safety Management Organizational Transition Procurement Management Inventory Control and Management The following departments were added to bring long term value to our customers by IP Environmental Compliance Management increasing operational effectiveness and efficiency SCADA Management • • • • firWorkforce Development Strategic Planning • Integrated Water Resource Plan Rate Study Strategic Planning Updated Mission Statement: ��� CO (J %, ? Our mission is to develop an environmentally �, 11111 ` and economically sustainable utility that is focused on protecting the public health, safety, 0611 and general welfare by providing clean and safe potable water, wastewater, and reclaimed GJ, 6 c6Ca. water services through conservation of natural resources, diversification of the water supply �lY A UTVO portfolio, and development of a highly trained professional staff prepared for tomorrow's challenges. ' --- - • StrategicPlanningN. - = 4 .. ^ -N. w • c ~. ss' Phase I nearlycomplete f.• � - , .. �- ' p + - .- • Presentation to the - it CCUA Board of Supervisors in February Effective UtilityManagement Staff will Recommend A Primer for Water and Wastewater Utilities proceeding with Phase II to January 2017 6EPA �. b. . ei Anti. A IL WA. dI[�7 emxmt:1 wa.�ceon METROPOLITAN �r WATER AGENCIES -� �� "'9 '- '"I'�' s- - - Ulu i /\\ t NA ♦ "IBC wareMErnvryonme nt � 141aa.ir .cI�hIr:I'I ASvCiI<.11 t � Strategic Planning to Workforce Development The Water, Wastewater, and Reclaimed Water industry is heavily regulated . Protection of public health, safety, and general welfare is priority. Workforce Development People retiring are outpacing people entering the water and wastewater operator trades . Competition among utilities for licensed operators is high . Increasing regulations driving the need for higher levels of operator licensing . Workforce Development, Increased High School Training and Wages a Internship Incentive Program Program Implementation Multiple Career Challenging and to of New Rewarding Technology Paths Careers Strategic Planning Integrated Water Resource Planning Clay County w°"'' - -j Orange Park -,... ___ Kr^I �� ! S'1111611111MIMIP C. , Integrated Water Resource pa . . PI nnin m '>' ems`" i . 0 C� Doctors Lake , .- .. ar r . 4 „.. „ -,,,L ., : i .4 _._ , , 63-11‘. - / --„.___‘,„ •.• _ ____ - 9 - 4 • The First Coast Expressway will bring .L . o substantialgrowth over the next 20 to 2 5 • . Ra years. ° ten, ____ , . Rd :'� ...-, _ „, _____„„.:�* ,f -, et r' • The Floridan Aquifer is approaching „ ... . ..„...,i . , . „,,.... in. .,. , , ,. , ,... sustainable limits■ ._,,_ t „ . --,___ , • ,,., ..., , :.,. %Vivo *A: Green Cove., C/,9yN. • Our regions growing population means Springs .i Coo 44 1 40, �Y Penney.Farms '� — diversification of water supply resources 1j ° N g -. will be keyfor long -term sustainabilit . • sustainability. o:. Legend ' Bayard` ww•e.,ro.rpc:•:ir,,,ec�.>le,p.�..., _ Conservation Arc ■c.rr,em.aar ` •` Exlwne'Cny Camp SI.mfrc Mu+t,MI 6an.ry rks and Conservation Land o.rk.b Fero. COMHrv.son - ---F° ro CR 2%8 Rosh t Aa - ... First Coast Expressway ROW i " r'7� ,' with Proposed Interchange Locations :�........ Clay County, Florida Vp / _� . ` _I i e. I�iIli I � N �.. j 1 s N Fe V 7. ��I .. 4 Viet �►.� 1 Integrated we. e— ti1 ` 1 _ -__ $,-". --, , . . ... Min,"on �e",,,S a /— iw r- ..( Water , • — L. -rll "'rigu.ouw EG " CI • as E3�'M • wm . ��.� If,C�A Resource rIlk --,..yi Ai- -' ill IL """e. sows Devbpn nl Nam_ 1=2:12 ilit...e rl, id ,e I Planning a �- H.,_- -� 6 EU . r J o p _ rfRoughlygoM of capital o � r infrastructure is in some form of I Keystone Heights ©® e 1 planning, design, or construction mR , ' N f ta MLUN_Aaa li7, EXHIBIT"A" -a mmEnumnaium Current capital improvement plan r 06. L ©®I mmatium budgets exceed $25oM on the 5- LIM' MEND WNW. ale Population Potable _1 - ' 'L' MI= aroma N1re+l wmanalMGbl year horizon. �0 augg�.6,�. ,� oa � reMpSn aaeM lln Em11 w'�� n �. I o D egmen ,nren eewe, 6Developments wt.,a agreements 6.011 16.PPE e2.86e (� MUa� 1>PM i6.60> 126,56E ti "rosTY•a>[n vnucf(WELL Ilel. • • "I ' I1 \Z �.. �® Nreew"on _ _. Integrae Water Resource Planning I V Y R P Process Demand Operational and System Forecast Constraints ri Systems Model Characterize Water Supply Assemble Integrated and DSM Options Alternatives Using Hydrologic,Cost and Mass Balance Themes Evaluation of Alternatives Decisi s _ ■ Software to Rank Initial Alternatives Define Planning Objectives&Metrics (Weighted Criteria) Develop"Hybrid" Alternatives Uncertainty =MO. Recommended Analysis Projects I A Test Alternatives Under Risk Factors 6 ntoe ra ed vva er esourceID l • Modeling and forecasting population growth remains central to the planning effort. • Modeling and forecasting is essential to investment decisions regarding infrastructure. MGO 2046 Total Water Demand 4• 004 40° Growth Model Statistical Results .IC 220 Total Water Demand - 20 6 °• 302 Trials io,000 2• Base Case 19.842 Mean 2o.124 I 1 1 002 202 R Median 20.122 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Mode 19.476 ,• i Potable Dem and ToaI.Total Potable Demand(95 PerrEnble) ■Potable Demand Toal.TOal Potable Demand(90 Perenble) ■Potable Dem and Total.Total Potable Dem and(75 Percendle) ,• —Potable Demand Toal.Total Potable Demand(50 Percentile) ■Potable Demand Toal.Toal Potable Demand(25 Per¢n°le) I Potable Demand Toal.Toal Potable Demand(10 Peroenble) Standard Deviation 0.907 ,m Potable Dem and ToaI.Total Potable Demand(5 Percendle) —Potable Demand Total.Potable Total Permit Variance o.823 °% °° • Water Demand Forecast performed by Skewness o.0595 • Kurtosis 2.99 .10 the CDM Smith team Coeff. of Variance o.0451 °°+ ,T200 ,9G00 ,9100 ,9l00 ,9900 ,Biota 19e• ,9100 2o.00 00a mmo 2i 000 2,0(O 2,0:0 2,9b0 RAo au -1° MGD Minimum 17.124 1- c...•0• % I I. Maximum 24.160 Mean Std. Error o.00• Water Demand Forecast performed by the CCUA team Integrated Resource Planning ...I Potable Potable Water P Reclaimed Water lii Stormwater Reclaimed Harvesting Water for irrigation Reclaimed Lower Aquifer Water storage Feasibility and availability Expanding Alternative Water Supplies Water Demand(Million Gallons) • • N W W A A Ui Ui Ol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b b b b b b b b n O OCT'11 DEC -1 dd_ 4 FEB 7�►� t!�- APR 0) iu- JUN �- AUG vi M pro OCT'12 tb CL DEC CD FEB .=! u, 3 APR 111 ' DJ JUN 3 = AUG OW OCTOCT'13 CD �� v) DEC m 41 m FEB CD W A APR VI (,,...,,, us JUN !lir co amo. Lo AUG 7/►" 4 rD O i.� OCT'140.0. �} I DEC n _ kill VI FEB in O cu 0. APR lips-- n D JUN AUG _ n c O 01* OCTem IM iiildi _it < R.,.. o DEC G CD FEB iL N1 APR CD O Cr JUN leing___ v 14. O rD n AUG _ C o OCT'16 (D DEC SD 06 D - n) FEB •' �., Q CU N zz APR VI n) ` p JUN al GI `� R. D AUG CF1 CD LO o OCT'17 a) w = \ DEC n FEB 71 - Mir 13 O ii APR i `O 3 = JUN Ia) = ri) AUG cu - OCT'18 � 111 `� (D = DEC n . D FEB i �v�. Lizf"F � APR IT Z 0 m JUN o AUG OCT'19 VI 3 CD DEC04 APR ,W6? DJ JUN �/ ON IQ IV 0 OCT'20 N 0 DEC 00 FEB - ~ n — _ IQ FE0(011111 B - CD 0 JUNE "' co CD 0 AUG w n 70 '21 ko '`' p 73 OCT yC.� N o , o w ;. • r d� its �� .. _ ec a • me a er •• \ • l ssk�. 16, 229 Customer Accounts on the �� _,ter Reclaimed System (November 2o21) • a! .4.,--: _ ...- - .-_,..._ __ ., .il1løilk f A JP and growing „ W Roughly 3o% of all Customer Accounts -. . : . :; .. R y: have reclaimed water service available - 1 i �, �' �'' fr ram' , ; Total Reclaimed Water Billed (MGaI.)350.000 Storage of reclaimed water remains a central 300000 issue for supply to meet customer demand 250.000 2 �2�D� • Supply is high when demand is low tso.000 �t�D� V • Supply is low when demand is high 50.000 0.000 "1 K' >n rc > ro '5 e> .ai J 6> m J a >m C' n >h G' J a' > T 'J a' c 2 J 6 '"y ' d> • Roughly , 5 wastewater customers W z z G G 7�u z_'G Q u z z G Q u z z Q Q ]�u z r G Q 7 w z z Q Q 7 w z z G Q �u z 1 Z ��� �z z �� �'"z z� �„"z= � �„"z Z�� '^ z z�� '^ z z�� '"z z � � „"z z ���� z z� �� � z z��� �z a a a a a a a a a a Month Billed generates supply for 1 reclaimed customer LBW BILLED Lower Aquifer Feasibility INVESTIGATION FINDINGS Investigation . :� I.�...._... �- : Completed in 2021MI - __- -- Drilled through the Lower 1 Amirm ,•3ve Florida Aquifer in3 locations � __ � >_ � R s Tested the hydrogeology -1 --t - Evaluated feasibility of the following : � �:_ _ .. - �� - � • Alternative Water r 1:7 a.E: .aa".11 LITMOIOO' NVORCXFOL CAW INTS CR CONTACT Supply PLtOPERTES Q UMW.* 0 Sweu..a.er ern .Nda9.aLagle l.l, 0 I=U 11 Lpp.mrh.rq.M a Fladr� ^ieLn.lnLa tawdry a \'I 0 Lmeoame scpaer system 10.000A.agrum sJer IL Cano.ons raw Dill aged gee Same -Sraelore Falder.Away SMn^ aoncenInion Uva! LJ timer Haver avert. Olocaale Awls, wyrat • Aquifer Storage and � °to maws Recovery GENERALIZED HYDROGEOLOGIC CROSS-SECTION CLAY COUNTY UTILITY AUTHORITY Kimley >>Horn CLAY COUNTY,FLORIDA JULY 2011 • Aquifer Injection Stormwater a ry e St i n . ...„lo 1 l .4 �T. , Pilot Project is operating f 19 , V- 1 it ( r We are testing : {A f1 II h ,l • Water Quality _, • Water Quantity -�Test results will provide _ direction on the larger scale ° application of these systems ;:, t ,1 PotableReclaimed Water . t '• �; .� ; ,,� � � Q '�'�, � 1117... �e `• Pilot Project Under Design Ozone Biologically Activated Carbon Filter g y System 20 GPM p project ilot sP NTH Clay County Utility Authority vim Treatability Study and Pilot Design /� �c' Technical Memorandums CCUA intends to use the facility AUTH0 BASIS OF DESIGN to • Test the system DRAFT I July2021 • Train staff • Educate key stakeholders C Strategic Planning Rate Study _ 0 J lJ ce ce w w ~ Q V IE H � uQ ICU (13 ce � z O w tin Q Z L � w � w o- O '-u 0 0 I.R Rate Study ..,. We recently engaged the CDM Smith team with this expertise. PerCCUA's enabling legislation, revenue must equal th expenses. cDifil 75 Surplus funds are directed to capital budget to minimize Snlith I11' p g impact of potential debt on customer rates. M Study will include base charges, flow charges, capacity fees, user fees, etc. -- Evaluate planned capital expenditures, potential changes in regulations, and how to finance those costs over time I . 1 CCUA Ra e t s Clay County Utility Authority Illustrative Monthly L;tility Bill Comparisons at t"arious Usage Levels -Residential Water and Sewer Customer Served by a 5/S x 3/4 Meter- Utility Average Thousands of Gallons per Month 3 6 10 1 CCUA* S85.46 S52.50 S68.43 S99.03 $121.88 -111 Green Cove Springs S94.73 S46.91 S74.60 S107.52 S 149.87 Town of Orange Park $95.24 S57.12 $77.02 $106.92 S139.88 JEA $96.11 S52.61 $73.03 $107.02 $151.79 St. Johns County S104.16 S55.91 S82.64 S120.60 $157.50 GRU S103.19 S46.64 S76.64 S118.55 S170.93 ECUA $115.74 $53.21 S87.32 $132.79 S189.64 i o *Calculations include rates effective 10/01/2021 Median $96.11 $52.61 $76.64 $107.52 $151.79 Mean $99.23 $52.13 $77.10 $113.20 $154.50 Water Demand and R Billed vs Water Demand and Wastewater Loads Billed vs Water Demand, Wastewater Loads, & Reclaimed Water Demand Customers w/o Reclaimed Water(0.625"Meter) Customers w/ Reclaimed Water(0.625" Meter) October 2021 SAD $400� October 2021 3000 4500 $350.03 ..00)k1 4000 2500 5300 00 3500 '500.00 2000 ,� ?50.00 N N_ ` - a 3000 o m o 5400.00 m O a a u 2 500 :00.00 0 L., 1500 0 `0 0 o E u To E ti 300.00 5 • 2000 B. 0 0 z tS0.00 I- z 1000 11111111111111 1500 200.00 1000 r,Ixi 100.00 500 ',7.00 iiiiilll -III 0 $0.00 0 50.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112 1314 1516 17 18 19202122 2324 25 2627 2829303132 333435 3637 3839404142434445464748495051 Total Water Demand,Wastewater Load,and Reclaimed Water Demand(1,000 Gal.Increments) Water Demand and Wastewater Load(1,000 Gal.Increments) ti Total Potable Water Charges Total Wastewater Charges I•Total Reclaimed Water Charges ti Total Potable Water Charges I•Total Wastewater Charges AWS Surcharge SJRWMD Surcharge -Residential Customers w/o RW AWS Surcharge SJRWMD Surcharge -Residential Customers PW with RW Bringing St rate is Current anticipated Phase I Strategic Plan Phase II Strategic Plan delivery dates in 2022 Presentation: February Engagement Request: PlanningFebruary Elements infora ' .... Landing Integrated Water Rate Study Alternative Water Resource Plan Presentation: June/July Supply Annual Update: Presentation: June/July July `gyp.( C 0 uAi?), Questions? G '?e/Ty ALYnk '''