Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutEDB Clay BCC Presentation Water Demand, Supply, and Management c„, cotti .,, ��I G�i��r1, „„„., -\`� Water Demand , Integrated Water Resource Planning , and Water Quality EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: JEREMY D. JOHNSTON, MBA, PE CHIEF ENGINEER: PAUL STEINBRECHER, PE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER: JEFFREY WESSELMAN, CPA CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER: TERI SHOEMAKER, PE CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER: KIMBERLY RICHARDSON Agenda ❑ Initial Numbers and Statistics • Where we are now • Where we are going ❑ Integrated Water Resource Planning • Demand Side Management U Water Quality • The Clean Waterways Act • CCUA's Infill Policy • Doctor's Lake Septic to Sewer Conversion • •nl 1 um r nStatistics Where we are now Where we are going Clay County -- / +r '' 1.T'x r.:Ya Fd, d11F�IC 1 p fI. " „ a q an e\.Ire �I ti N P 'il^ - _• Orange Park za ,,,..,. d i�i�� 9 qNI.41 e I s"'µ i 1 e.`7 e .oocam take a �� • �` ®,1�' klk cy x Awr..e Rd (n _ �' r 5 ✓ 15 0444.Rd NA, � ' -,,p Green.C C/d yee a. -'.'.\ --''''',--.7.. l� ll Springs�} yc cO 4.,,..,�.. I Y-oft oe'ay'y 18 •\ ..f. 11 z' a z . Ome Legend + �? rvr� Bayard 9 Mann Mr Maxr.m., v.ew-..non P.a c..«e,..,..�� % �. ConservationAre 32 ND a) Ave dw..ew. CR M i \`\ ,34 m0x.. Co,Mond, • Perks and Conservation Land �. my.yw...a. I44........ +•.� u...zazzi tea. sr--. \ fo.1 Acre 43 eary 32 44 a.....444.4. 0 •n [... szs .zux m mow.... . Frst Coast Ex resswa ROW — o...-._._ a ea Ann*. a r,,... !.s r.,..=..,.u.M.,.•i.n,.,, °... L RAN I MS:3 0,966 w. .a« a ....a 53 ss ...e .�°.. M 0 51 Grave/II 56 BOY 24{0 Comm te. I with Proposed Interchange Locations = M. v. h ,,h, (—' f .t ,w.r.,, _-,=_ _ - Clay County,Florida ,� ClayCountyPopulation Where we are now 250,000 The Clay County Utility Authority 200,000 (CCUA) currently serves roughly 59% of the population in Clay County 0 150,000 CZS p., 100,000 50,000 0 ■Total Residents ■ Served by CCUA Data Source: Florida Score Card.org CCUA Billing Data Residential Accounts x 2.76 People per Household CCUA Customer Accounts 6o,000 50,000 +' 40,000 0 U U 30,000 E 0 U 20,000 10,000 0 _ •Total: ■ Residential: • Commercial: • Commercial Irrigation: •Water Only: • Sewer Only: •Total Reclaimed Water: • Residential Reclaimed Water: •Commercial Reclaimed Water: Data Source: CCUA Customer Billing December 2021 CCUA Current Customer Account Makeup 5.6% 1.0% 0.5% ik 92.9% ■Residential: ■Commercial: ■Commercial Irrigation: ■Sewer Only: Data Source: CCUA Customer Billing December 2021 Essential and Non-Essential Uses of Water Essential Potable Water Uses Non-Essential Uses of Potable Water ❑ Sustaining human and animal health U Irrigation and safety • Lawns, • Consumption • Community common areas, • Personal Hygiene • Ornamental plants, • Household Cleaning • Trees, • ❑ Fire fighting to protect public health and Shrubs, etc. safety U Outdoor cleaning • Homes or Buildings, • Vehicles, • Driveways, or Sidewalks, etc. U Decorative fountains or pools U Recreational swimming pools Key Point: CCUA customers CCUA Customer using a total of 3.62% less water today than in 2008/2009 with Potable Water Demand 9,516 additional customer accounts ,., 600.0 0 0 550.0 711 C. 500.0 . o i )1SAV\ 450.0 t /A, p, : w N ,, 1 %,, , , i rv. A 1 ,'.4 ' NA A ):'; 4,1,, , : 4H 1\ ... k . ,A 4 ' , x Is �,i x Cl 1( % j1 i N i t t 350.0 ,► ` sue ,at_ , ��_) x _ iL ir lit \ ' 'I I ct X ' , r �� r' 300.0 r C) CZ 2500 it I I H . p4 a p4 p4 a 1- V p4 a V .0 p4 a P. © ,� p4 a CO p4 00 0\ p4 a O p4 a o p4 1 1-1 O O O O O ; O '-D O O O O ° O Month BASE YEAR (08-09) y MGAL PUMPED --)--CONSERVATION GOAL (15%) Linear (MGAL PUMPED) Data Source: CCUA Water Demand Analysis December 2021 Key Point: Roughly 65% of CCUA Customer reclaimed water produced is beneficially reused by customers Reclaimed Water Demand for irrigation. Total Reclaimed Water Billed (MGal.) 350.000 300.000 250.000 200.000 150.000 U as 50.000 0.000 Month Billed Data Source: CCUA Water Demand Analysis December 2021 Number of Active Residential Accounts All Meter Sizes 50,000 45,000 40,000 o 35,000 1 1 1 L ill. IL I 'it. U <1 30,000 25,000 cu up y 20,000 P4 N 15,000 U 10,000 5,000 0 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21 Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21 Oct-21 Nov-21 Dec-21 •Total No. Accts. 45,681 45,728 45,883 46,001 46,047 46,129 46,233 46,418 46,496 46,578 46,767 46,864 •Tier 1 32,293 33,889 32,184 29,506 26,218 30,269 32,421 34,168 33,008 30,934 34,804 33,936 •Tier 2 11,223 10,249 10,100 11,934 13,009 12,026 10,709 9,327 9,555 11,144 8,883 10,554 •Tier 3 1,442 1,040 2,228 2,460 3,478 2,405 1,822 1,775 2,494 2,338 1,862 1,450 •Tier 4 723 550 1,371 2,101 3,342 1,429 1,281 1,148 1,439 2,162 1,218 924 Data Source: CCUA Water Demand Analysis December 2021 Average Daily Water Demand (GPD) Per Residential Account All Meter Sizes woo ::: C,. 700 «i 600 N a cn 500 O Td 400 C.. bbA 300 cb s- N 200 illui it III" It it il ill ill Jo illi 1 100 0 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21 Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21 Oct-21 Nov-21 Dec-21 •Tier 1 103 106 112 105 102 103 103 108 105 103 110 103 ■Tier 2 258 263 281 271 269 266 270 276 271 272 283 267 •Tier 3 478 481 496 488 486 479 488 484 4$1 489 495 488 ■Tier 4 896 851 88o 888 935 921 897 923 930 891 894 905 •Weighted Average 229 159 191 204 239 190 179 176 185 199 178 168 Data Source: CCUA Water Demand Analysis December 2021 Residential Customer Tiers and Water Use Total Residential Customer Accounts Total Residential Potable Water Use December 2021 December 2021 3 09/ 1.97% 10.64% 9.01% 22.52% 44.48% \72.41% 35.87%— ■ Tier 1 ■ Tier 2 ■ Tier 3 ■ Tier 4 ■ Tier 1 ■ Tier 2 ■ Tier 3 ■ Tier 4 Data Source: CCUA Demand Frequency by Tier Analysis Residential Customer Tiers and Water Use Total Residential Customer Accounts Total Residential Potable Water Use 12 Month Rolling Average 12 Month Rolling Average 4.47% 3.19% 15.52% 23.2o% • 11.68%_ 11111666._ \_39.13% 69.14% 33.67% • Tier 1 • Tier 2 ■ Tier 3 • Tier 4 • Tier 1 • Tier 2 ■ Tier 3 ■ Tier 4 Data Source: CCUA Demand Frequency by Tier Analysis All Customer Accounts Tiers, and Water Use Total All Customer Accounts All Customer Account Potable Water Use December 2021 December 2021 0 2.91% 1' 4% 8.82% 7.51 21.08% 54.99% 1 28.68% 74.17% • Tier 1 • Tier 2 ■ Tier 3 • Tier 4 • Tier 1 • Tier 2 ■ Tier 3 ■ Tier 4 Data Source: CCUA Demand Frequency by Tier Analysis All Customer Accounts , Tiers , and Water Use Total All Customer Accounts All Customer Account Potable Water Use 12 Month Rolling Average 12 Month Rolling Average 4.22%-\2.98% 12.69%� 21.65% 9.77% _51.12% 71.15% 26.42% • Tier 1 • Tier 2 ■ Tier 3 • Tier 4 • Tier 1 • Tier 2 ■ Tier 3 ■ Tier 4 Data Source: CCUA Demand Frequency by Tier Analysis ComparingEssential vs Non-Essential Potable Water Use Residential Customers Residential Customers (December 2021) (12 Month Rolling Average) 39.3% 46.0% 54.0% 60.7% •Essential •Non-Essential •Essential •Non-Essential Data Source: CCUA Demand Frequency by Tier Analysis ComparingEssential vs Non-Essential Potable Water Use All Customers All Customers (December 2021) (12 Month Rolling Average) 46.6% 48.7% -53.4% 51.3% •Essential • Non-Essential •Essential • Non-Essential Data Source: CCUA Demand Frequency by Tier Analysis ClayCountyPopulation Where we are going Future Clay County Poplulation 400,00o 350,00o We estimate nearly 9n% of future growth will connect to 300,00o CCUA's utility systems 250,000 ct 200,000 a 0 At that rate, CCUA will a 150,000 serve roughly 75% of Clay 100,000 County's population 50,000 0 •Total Residents •Served by CCUA Data Source: University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research: High Growth Forecast CCUA Growth Forecast Forecast Potable Water Demands J , 15— tiii ‘IM1. 1 "IM"Illir— 12 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 f 1 I I 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 —Potable Dem and Total.Total Potable Demand (95 Percentile) ■ Potable Dem and Total.Total Potable Dem and (90 Percentile) ■ Potable Dem and Total.Total Potable Dem and (75 Percentile) —Potable Dem and Total.Total Potable Demand (50 Percentile) • Potable Dem and Total.Total Potable Dem and (25 Percentile) Potable Dem and Total.Total Potable Dem and (10 Percentile) Potable Dem and Total.Total Potable Demand (5 Percentile) —Potable Dem and Total.Potable Total Permit Data Source: CCUA IWRP Development with CDM Smith Note: CCUA's IWRP efforts with CDM Smith are still on-going and being developed. The concepts discussed are not in final form. Forecast Reclaimed Water Demands Shortage Comparison ,, Reclaimed Shortages Under Baseline Conditions —No Act on Max DSM 1, .Treatment Focused CCUA and the CDM 5 Smith team currently 0 A . iv. A 1 "�/�4 l N i\ N IL\ I\ I\ t C\1, .1 forecast a reclaimed 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2D31 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 water deficit by 2032 25 Reclaimed Shortages Under Stressed Conditions 20 No Action 11)11' 15 —Max DSM l. Treatment Focused 10 D _ _ � LjAfItkr► fir am a ki,_ 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 10 Data Source: CCUA IWRP Development with CDM Smith Note: CCUA's IWRP efforts with CDM Smith are still on-going and being developed. The concepts discussed are not in final form. Integrated Water Resource Planning ( IWRP ) CCUA initiated an IWRP effort in 2021 CCUA initiated a comprehensive effort to IWRP Process Demand Operational and System Forecast evaluate and plan for future water resources Constraints needed to support and sustain the community iw®� . connected to CCUA's utilitysystems. Supply �1111 �' Systemsol y We aim to Characterize Water Assemble Integrated and DSM Options Alternatives Using Hydrologic,Cost and Mass Balance conserve existing water resources while Themes Evaluation of Alternatives developing Alternative Water Supplies (AWS) to . �► SDecision oftware diversify the water resource portfolio for long—g— Define Planning Rank Initial Alternatives Objectives&Metrics (Weighted Criteria) Develop"Hybrid" term sustainability. Alternatives Uncertainty Recommended Analysis Projects Test Alternatives Under Risk Factors ■ 6 • Planning Horizon: 20 to 25 years Note: CCUA's IWRP efforts with CDM Smith are still on-going and being developed. The concepts discussed are not in final form. Demand Side Management (DSM) vs Water SupplyOptions DSM Options Increase Water Use Water Supply Options Reduce Reliance Efficiency & Reduce Irrigation Demand: on Groundwater: • Toilet Rebates • Indirect Potable Reuse • Clothes Washer Rebates • Stormwater Augmentation for Reclaimed • Pricing • Surface Water Treatment • Irrigation Efficiency Technology • Purchase of Additional CUP Water • Developer Requirements for Turf Reduction • Shallow Groundwater Supply Note: CCUA's IWRP efforts with CDM Smith are still on-going and being developed. The concepts discussed are not in final form. pCom arison of DSM and Water SupplyO tions p Turf Replacement Rebate (0.1 mgd) ANMER_ AINMWINft_ Ara'Ma] Single-Family Toilet Direct Install (0.2 mgd) cr► Clothes Washer Rebate (0.2 mgd) ANNIIMMIlliMM c O Smart Irrigation Controlloer Rebate (0.3 mgd) INII Q Single-Family Toilet Rebate (0.1 mgd) O Advanced Metering Infrastructure (0.6 mgd) 2 Ice Machine Rebate (0.1 mgd) ME 0 0 Pre-Rinse Spray Valve Rebate (0.1 mgd) IIINew Development 50% Turf Reduction (1.9 mgd) Reclaimed Price Adjustment (5.6 mgd) Small Surface Water for Potable (1.0 mgd) IIIIIMIr $9 cn Indirect Potable Reuse for Potable (0.9 mgd) IIIII= 111= 1111/Ara C O Large Surface Water for Potable (5.0 mgd) Q Indirect Potable Reuse for Reclaimed (3.8 mgd) 0 FDOT Stormwater Augmentation to Local (3.6 mgd) Surface Water for Reclaimed (1.0 mgd) 0- Reclaimed Storage Ponds (2.0 mgd) LA Transfer from JEA (2.0 mgd) I. v Stormwater Augmentation - On-Site (0.2 mgd) (13 New Shallow Aquifer Supply (1.4 mgd) IIIMM FDOT Stormwater Augmentation to WWTP (3.6 mgd) iiM Storage in Shallow Aquifer (0.8 mgd) Purchase of Additional CUP Supply (1.0 mgd) I , $0.00 $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 $3.00 $3.50 $4.00 // $10.00 Unit Cost ($/1,000 gallons) Note: CCUA's IWRP efforts with CDM Smith are still on-going and being developed. The concepts discussed are not in final form. Next Steps for CCUA in the IWRP and Future ClayCounty Considerations CCUA Clay County Board of County ' Commissioners • Develop and rank portfolios of DSM and supply options • Consider changes landscape ordinance to Developreferred strategyinclude reductions in turf coverage and • p increased irrigation efficiency for new development Upon completion of the IWRP, the CCUA team • Consider encouraging turf replacement to would like the opportunity to work with the more resilient drought resistant grasses Clay County and SJRWMD teams regarding the items listed on the right. Note: CCUA's IWRP efforts with CDM Smith are still on-going and being developed. The concepts discussed are not in final form. Water Quality The Clean Waterways Act P pEPARTMF Formerly known as Senate Bill 712 (2020 ° Legislative Session) T Z Regulation of septic tanks as a source of o �"MFNrAt P nutrients and transfers oversight from Department of Health (DOH) to Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). ioriaa The Clean Waterways Act BIENNIAL ENGINEERING Provision of financial records from all EVALUATION & REPORT wastewater facilities so DEP can ensure Fiscal Years 2020 and 2021 for funds are being allocated to infrastructure CLAY COUNTY UTILITY AUTHORITY upgrades, repairs, and maintenance to prevent systems from falling into states of ,�.y cou,v4 disrepair. r,, • ❑ CCUA already has an outside third party llitYAUTNO�`� prepare a Biennial Report to demonstrate that the infrastructure is being adequately Prepared by: MITTAUER & ASSOCIATES, INC. financed, operated, and maintained. CONSULTING ENGINEERS Orange Park,Florida Project No.9204-45-5 ❑ Required in CCUA's Bond Resolution. January2022 The Clean Waterways Act ir- v Contingency plans for power ow . 0 outages to minimize discharges of untreated wastewater. ' �I CI AU CCUA Water Treatment _-_ and Water Reclamation !-- -= _ Facilities along with most lift ,;Lid$81/W 8j= - •___ _ stations are already equipped =_ = ! with generators. -Ell ==_ = I ci „W, , ` uII 0 0 * fill AL l" 'z - ay V _s d! ,-,,,,rte..z -..-4,.a .7 i,.;- kt-2-.4 AIS 1 r_ .. The Clean Waterways Act Land application of biosolids must comply with water table separation requirements or demonstrate water supply quality protection BCR through water quality monitoring and nutrient management techniques. ❑ CCUA implemented the use of a Biologic Nutrient Reduction system that produces Solid Solutions a Grade AA biosolid in 2006. ❑ 5 (soon to be 6) of CCUA's 7 water reclamation facilities will produce a Grade AA biosolids. 0 uekye.i pir eon r_«....r_ti usnera me ��yy , e f 41! , ; . ; :i. ..,,,ter ,, % . ,- mare _ T4 The Clean Waterways Act .}k , '-'1 '' I ': . - - ' ' ''--.-.''.-. - .'' - - t.. ..._. ....., . 1 ..fi L, .. ,----, iti, lir. .+r,.. .. m°ore ri 1r - , _ DEP to adopt rules to require utility M R�.n, w.� ...Lc.. aaoa,. �; �. asset management plans and .«.� II II 1I . 11 a ep 6I Sy. In document expenditures on asset ::ll��: �; 0 .0management and rehabilitation __ _ ; , j :-. .❑ CCUA began implementing a GIS .,. l . All • 11,.. . k„.___LP system before 2012 _AX.r:, '�• .1 ❑ CCUA initiated implementation of an . `Sx"'pe•'° 5bet1 Asset Management System (AMS) in CCUAWater Mai Asset Sum' GrDavity Mainrd ...MUM Click Water Main Gravity Main r-p Click Subdivision (Material) (Material) 2017 3,810 . ;H:::ISMATS z` Fire Hydra Z Z. 673.9 467.7 Miles I • v Reclaimed Mai Force Main O .L. '' iEJOxPS (Material) (Material) 12r432 - O 0., 1.o.c 2,119 won 0 s 1,025 �" 204.5., .,,193 9,.. .si.,. t � B c . L.nE The Clean Waterways Act DEP to report to the Legislature and Governor an annual summary of sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs), including causes and volumes recorded Volume of Volume of Number Wastewater Year of SSOs Transmitted Wastewater % Success % Loss (gal) Spilled (gal) 2019 7 2,548,739,000 69,875 99.997 0.003 2020 5 2,703,912,100 23,272 99.999 0.001 2021 13 2,697,501,000 217,439 99.992 0.008 2022 (1st Quarter) 3 409,748,00o 14,171 99.997 0.003 Data Source: CCUA internal environmental incident tracking The Clean Waterways Act --., li- 111 Fines and Penalties A ___ � • Doubles fines for wastewater violations ,.. 01.,,, lk "` `'�' - • • Increases the cap on total administrative ek, - penalties assessed by DEP from $ioK to $5oK Irr, ► • Increases the cap per violator from $5K to idlirl $1oK O 0 O The Clean Waterways Act DEP initiated rulemaking to enable potable c c1ro11 . reclaimed water projects. Engineers...Working Wonders With Water'" I Disinfection Solids and - i- Sodium Disinfection and Trace Pathogen Disinfection and Trace Hypochlorite Organics Removal Removal Organics Removal Disinfection - U J JL JLTn1JL JLTJE.TJLTJ Y 0 0 0 0 — DrinkingWater Reclaimed Water 0 0 0 0 •,,•,;,;;,;;,;,_;;,;,;;,;,;,,•,;,;• ♦ I f I r 1r lr lr if lr lr lr 1 . . .. . . .. . m j n UV Ozone + Biofiltration Ultrafiltration GAC Disinfection Adsorption Trace Organics Removal ,..:,,;•4.•y .......1;.c-,..-0 /pm • NIIIMITITTI IfF The Clean Waterways Act .)...atra -am1114. t fi. -4•.' �- P.- f ty . . . .. V ti = , , DEP and water management districts will �' _`:_� : , initiate rulemaking to update stormwater .. ` design and operations regulations. ,,.r-, 1��; ;Y '_f, , Performance of Advanced Wastewater Treatment (AWT) Facilities vs Traditional Septic Tanks 2021 Annual Average Estimated Discharge to Surface Waters per Household (lbs/house/year) 25 20 15 10 8 5 0.32 o.io 0 TN TP •CCUA Average Plant Discharge to Surface Waters ■ Estimated Septic Discharge to Surface Waters Data Source: CCUA Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR)to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Jones Edmunds and Associates, Inc. estimated septic tank information (performance varies based upon size, soil conditions, water table, etc.) Performance Permit Limits vs . CCUA AWT Systems Clay County Utility Authority Water Reclamation Facility Performance Permit Limit v. Actual Surface Water Discharge 400 January - December 2021 ct ¢, 300 280 294 cn rti 0 0 a 200 a) cct'0 151 ' 100 36 17 40 38 1 4. 0 CBOD5 TSS TN TP • Permitted •Actual Data Source: CCUA Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR)to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bo ra A 'S in fll Policy igi)V4* tir • In April 1999, CCUA Board of k- 4P*4o 4 alp *4 , / r ps„. Supervisors approved a program to -to l'i•Qzsoo_ Ala; 440. %c extend water, sewer, and reclaimed water w * 4,21 • Vjlr iii(6471 mains to utility services to communities 4kkb,1 AL/ we AfArApi-mm _ that are currently using private wells and Tri septic tanks. - WE" # 0411"-clita • Limited to communities located in the - • **IP V. % vicinity of existing CCUA mains. °c1° P191- 4, firi, • Each customer benefitting from the h4p 43, service extensions will pay their PSIt 104 11111 • *Pko proportionate (pro rata) share of the 4P*4* #41***4P4 oft project cost. 4,44-4tve.4„ ,41 • h:Atpt, ktr fta • Financing provided, if needed. to /0111 PttrAitt t&itk<zi *04041 -p 4***44.11J01,* - • 75% participation required to initiate an ill project 4tipk, " I I iw•4 ppo prl* ofir, ,41P4 • _ ottNett•46, ti**WLIPIt * e op. Doctor's Lake _ . cin.rtn io/ie/zni ax�o au scomm s�mm�,re a Septic to Sewer - - �� N , .^ a y Conversion Today ,0: ;F ��. b r . ‘;- vP P�'N° how • CCUA / State of Florida / �-�` °°° SJRWMDpartnered project1. �t ' , • Focused on improving the water .... s ,; : � ` , quality impacts to Doctors Lake .° E, i..• . ,, •J • DOCTORS ,, from aging septic systems. •.. • Eliminating approx. 77 existing 1 `2' septic tanksa g e a u. • 6,20o LF of new sewer GRAPHIC main CA - ..- ` w� CUYCOUNTY UTILITY IC TO CENTRALIZED • •�' A jo ,G, DOCTORS LAKE AREA SEPTIC SI CENTRALIZED KEY �at�2� SEPT 1 O SANITARY SEWER CONVERSION IN-FILL S� �JY� w .we pp1® CLAY COUNTY,FLORIDA 'PL L N TM °6 > Estimated cost originally a maximum of $15,000 per home > Realized costs may end-up between $15,000 to $20,000 per home. it III,-F..,rl• •.. 1Y� r` '�Yl0't., ern..., n 1 • ,C 'N t�. 0 t. Y"� � i F , �. • s. ,. •rt :� � ; Doctors Lake Septic '..1(-1. r pit t 4 re", i;a. AO* • __ _ ,:� 7` : to Sewer Conversion Y , .. . . . t, �. Tomorrow _,,, .. .., . ,,, ..o. , ��.. • .5` . . . . ,, , . .. ,. r, f.. . „,. ,•. is , / '. ,.;� �- 4.-- , • Study completed in December 2020 which lir 209 `� M \ .- ti,. J` 1'. ` j ',. 114%•6 `' ' "' �-� `` analyzed and identified seven project �,, F <, * � = • �+ areas encompassing 368parcels adjacent a p gJ .. to Doctors Lake. ` , ;. A multi-year implementation phasing plan � ' - �61. .; 4.i developed. _ :.� . ; �t�." . .' ,- r. • • Mapbelow represent the overall study F Nrr .. • t•firkil•—�:r� ilp 4 area with project area boundaries. . .4,*1. , . 4, .4 . . ,. .. %.•;?... .s,„; . . • .• . tor z .404, _ ' • _-7-a., 7,,. 1.-4 . s, ,,,,A Legend . A m Protect Area A Project Area E Muller Street WWTF ' t# ProtectArea B Protect Area F N 0 2,000 4,000 Fleming Island WWTF �� Project Area C Project Area G WE Feet Protect Area D Previous Protect Area S 1-50,000 Requirements to Connect to CCUA's Systems c wren,.Cammament CommunityC LA Web site 0 Utility ApplApplication GIS Portal C oFroa address orplace a �, G,., �, " � !!l�yy� The further a homeowner or :: i 0.4 4 N 4 . Eas -- Po '11/iN.. �� , ',5,P developer is from CCUA's existing acto .r ry ' ` ` � infrastructure the technical and " s.„, ,�", ' .. a�D . ",Dom-'' � �� =� " " " financial challenges increasebi " � } • The technical and economic t "` o " ,�'` „ realities to connect to CCUA's utility,,� c `' " " systems vary. �'' Plant Capacity �� NEB \" �$ ,� ,; • Line Capacity * . " „ �,, • Pressures \ • Flow rates 44 ,-- • Roads t TtMP��336�NG 1 t Source:Eari Meaer Geo e£arthea,Geo•re•hi.s ONES/Airbus DS USO USGS.Ae-uGRID IGN,endthe GlS Uaer Commun' esr • Trees • Stormwater Pipe and Structures > The further the distance to connect could easily escalate costs well • Other utilities beyond $20,00o per home. Requirements to Connect to CCUA's Systems Connection Charges Cost of the Plant Connection Charge = , .n. ERC's Served ,, Connection charges pay for infrastructure that r �` has been built to serve the community. ,`4 .: ,:p;'�f � - --, 4 '- CCUA is agreeing to serve a customerpotable ,-r „� y - �� g g ?� ' ��jG� water, wastewater, and reclaimed services for ,f • x_ e posterity. -.rr® • Current connection charges _.. . „ , . , ., - . ., , ,,,v- , s., _ . .....*: -iv' yfor Water = $36o per ERC ` 1N. - A Fleming Island WTF BTU 3 Expansion 20-133 tmoge# 49 0.8181m Date 12.23.21 Wastewater = $3,20o per ERC 74, wwwge 72752rophoto.co Reclaimed Water = $30o per ERC Note: CCUA currently has a rate study underway. Current connection charges noted above will likely change in future fiscal years. .A If: .1 1 4 , q.� t la L, r {N . — l I 1 • • r� _..sue'• 1 M11 P ....w �� b11R 1 ;? Request Consideration of . 4� - �.�- . Requirements to Connect w �..M. 9 .I tiw� _ 41 As the CCUA team completes the IWRP, we would _�_ \ _. _ �``e,___. like the opportunity to work with the ClayCounty �, e__ _ pp Y ee team to develop ordinance language and technical ara guidance for the following: \::-- - Connection requirement for individual homes with utility infrastructure within 50o LF of ' Keystone Heights 1 property lines ' - • Consistent with the Branan Field and Lake , EXHIBIT"A" Asbury Master Plans. r-p .o Connection utility requirements for all developer 114. '--- \ ' =m; : :=:._ driven projects (residential, commercial, and industrial) `���( Co(�NT raw= I ie/T Y A U1 H��`�-- 6-27 Questions ?