HomeMy WebLinkAboutFYI Sustainable Growth in Clay County Florida Final Y 4 ` }
Y 1 '� � ~ T .,w'f�
� . . .. �. �� . :_ Sustainable
■
•
•iT;!;::
• _.„__ _ . _ �. Growth in
1 ., , .i. z;,..__,,,..
, _
- Clay C
. ..
c ;l...�......imai s
_-, o r i a
'5 /41111. 1/ -- __ f �� _ ow D . Johnston , MBA , PE
Mot
re 7
`? �__ i/Win - 111111111)
, Executive Director �yCOUiV
Tl'AUTH°
1‘3„N COUIvi
I
Y AUTN
Mission Statement
Strategic Planning
Forecasting Growth
fla Integrated Water Resource Planning
Capital Improvement Program
tO Rate Study
Challenges and Opportunities
,ustainable Growth in Clay County, Florida 2
--
(cr.:.•( COUNT`
CCUA's Mission Statement ,;,....
r�
Y AUTN
Our mission is to develop an environmentally and economically sustainable
utility that is focused on protecting the public health, safety, and general
welfare by providing clean and safe potable water, wastewater, and
reclaimed water services through conservation of natural resources,
diversification of the water supply portfolio, and development of a highly
trained professional staff prepared for tomorrow's challenges.
NW , -
/111.1, 1/4 . . -
400e * ""
. _4, _ __ ____ -
1,'Alt --'',,nit' , i r--
,- ,‘,4( , ... 4 Ns-, . ,
4„,,,,,t,,- - e. ) - ',, i i ‘, i ,, leo
_ c '''tN., -i.- • 1- , V ,
... — z yr , . e-1,.. , On is t • - • - • 4 ---,...*, i A -
/` ) _
•
�J
M.. ......eww.. Fkmm FbrM WIF BiU l E+gmwn 3Pt13 o..aun Z L y '
Iiwirlaiil
1)#r t; � 4 3
4 ,+
iror - '. , 2
ir-- (64/
. _ IF
+ � +`�/
W It
tt
Ov i-°ill - ` 'c
?; •41 api IV 7 k i .A i ,,
_fr i /> 4
I / it
4fr„
. k / i 4,
11 $ f
4
, i,
P.
1, . . r
�
, 1
,,
c.'.
C7
V1-1._ o
DC W
wimi C cu M
ra c a
L (o W
Elma ce
(i) OM
I .
What is Strategic Planning ?
Process of defining the following : "I‘� � LEADE.,,
J4
Organizational direction to achieve �o � Stakeholder
SQ �� Understanding Product
its vision and mission .`e &Support Quality
Q' Q Water f�
Sustainability bilit Satifaction Customer
Supports decision making related yro
z
to allocation of resources ° EFFECTIVE W
C
Community UTILITYN
LeadershipEmployee&
Customer Service Sustainability z
MANAGEMENT Development y
Financial
to v
.b.Human 3 Operational
F Enterprise Optimization
Resiliency
Physical Infrastructure ��Gf) Infrastruture c)
es/J7 Strategy ViabilityFinancia) \�y COUNr
Technology Fj1T Performance �� L \y
Information Systems KNOWLEDGE
Geel
TYAUTH° 5
I_ -u a.: ., 1 -
�.( COON x, i .
��� �� T1
TYAONO ; ;�
1
,,
t, �a
` 9
9 y,till.,„„ _.ilk•CIit_,....,„ A,,„z..
, ,,,__.,
... •
Forecasting "�
31 Qve _ .:.:
_ 011111:44?-4' I*
Growth - \ *•`
\_...i...„,_...„6., , A
PEOPLE ARE MOVING TO 1,..
No
,. ak.ew..mw
CLAY COUNTY \
23 30emer Ann
39 okrartris Woe
n Bran.,3ed lwee iamb
33 33a.ee
33 319 be
0 ube
u MO Ave
33 251 be ilmktIOMIalmmt Mama IINYP 1..M.
u 'lea Ave _ 4.W ae
39 d6 : du T r —_
b dwnw.mm.a n � wMr - - t��.np.,v.wwW.f.�.3p,n
(m.trew Nl\N 36 .nor.pan+ Deekpmen .1m t.ttwm Peep r
25. r.lyM 0 ry['u�w�e 1e 1 1.11
65 Am*.b 0.i�
*.l`C4 ai U644444,6II Sualxrwn Ppn SWmu ¢ep Develops
95 e d> 4019944 ......ame..n...pn MIK An"
WEI
54 tan./5Y-Mu] V hrak tnm Cc.*Wren 6316 W73 CO
53 mt L..I 9 E n,•
j S5 44laWd it (van.,t 1
30515a46 Cann_ N lellryw4l\\1 .m "m ••• `ID '- ..
54 ..n. 5t 7-MCA: 17e=�
(9çQ \\
Forecast of Potable Water Demand
G ♦ .1
We remain highly confident in our 24 MGD forecast
MGD
— 4
20-
15-
0
7.1117141111.MIIIMI."1111"M"11 -1 .11.111111M.°1111—' ' /---
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45
—Potable Demand Total.Total Potable Demand(95 Percentile) •Potable Demand Total.Total Potable Demand(90 Percentile) •Potable Dem and Total.Total Potable Demand(75 Percentile)
—Potable Dem and Total.Total Potable Demand(50 Percentile) • Potable Demand Total.Total Potable Demand(25 Percentile) Potable Demand Total.Total Potable Demand(10 Percentile)
Potable Dem and Total.Total Potable Demand(5 Percentile) —Potable Demand Total.Po table Total Permit
Data Source: CCUA IWRP Development with CDM Smith
Note: CCUA's IWRP efforts with CDM Smith are still on-going and being developed. The concepts discussed are not in final form.
7
co:4,
Forecast of Reclaimed Water Demands ro•�
Y AUTNO�`�
Shortage Comparison
25
Reclaimed Shortages Under Baseline Conditions
20
-No Action
15
10
Max DIM
ireatment Focused
A C
k, 1\ 1\ r\ r\ N N I\ l CCUA and the CDM
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021 2026 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2031 2036 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 20442045 2046 Smith team currently
25 forecast a reclaimed
Reclaimed Shortages Under Stressed Conditions
water deficit by 2032
-No Acton
15 Max DIM
'Treatment Focused
10
. NNIN \ 1701kK.fr\ k \kk.
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021 2026 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2031 2030 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046
10
Data Source: CCUA IWRP Development with CDM Smith
Note: CCUA's IWRP efforts with CDM Smith are still on-going and being developed. The concepts discussed are not in final form.
8
�I 1
CO thvi.
y
CAUTN
I iintegrated IWRP Process Demand operational
Forecast and System
Constraints
VVater -..._110.,0„ -.,, Systems
Model
Characterize Water supply Assemble Integrated
and OW Options Alternatives Using Hydrdogic.Cost and Mass Balance
Themes Evaluation of Alternatives
Re s o u r c e Decision
Sokware
Define PlanningRank lethal Alternatives
a n n n Objectives gMetAa
(Weighted Criteria) Dewlap`HOWd''
Alternatives Uncertainty
Analysisrt Recommended
Projects
lO Test Alternatives
Under Risk Factors
WHERE IS THE WATER GOING EL--
TO COME FROM ?
Data Source: CCUA IWRP Development with CDM Smith
Note: CCUA's IWRP efforts with CDM Smith are still on-going and being developed. The concepts discussed are not in final form.
9
`\j„yCO(3 )V
Comparison of DSM and Water Supply Options ' 1
Y AUTN
Turf Replacement Rebate(0.1 mgd) AMU
Single-Family Toilet Direct Install(0.2 mgd) =NE la
C Clothes Washer Rebate(0.2 mgd)
O Smart Irrigation Controlloer Rebate(0.3 mgd)
O. Single-Family Toilet Rebate(0.1 mgd)
0 Advanced Metering Infrastructure(0.6 mgd) ll
2 Ice Machine Rebate(0.1 mgd)
N Pre-Rinse Spray Valve Rebate(0.1 mgd) M
New Development 50%Turf Reduction(1.9 mgd)
Reclaimed Price Adjustment(5.6 mgd)
Small Surface Water for Potable (1.0 mgd)
'^ Indirect Potable Reuse for Potable(0.9 mgd) An
C
O Large Surface Water for Potable(5.0 mgd)
Q Indirect Potable Reuse for Reclaimed(3.8 mgd)
0 FDOT Stormwater Augmentation to Local(3.6 mgd)
A Z. Surface Water for Reclaimed(1.0 mgd)
C. Reclaimed Storage Ponds(2.0 mgd)
to Transfer from JEA(2.0 mgd)
N Stormwater Augmentation-On-Site(0.2 mgd)
to New Shallow Aquifer Supply(1.4 mgd)
FDOT Stormwater Augmentation to WWTP(3.6 mgd)
Storage in Shallow Aquifer(0.8 mgd)
Purchase of Additional CUP Supply(1.0 mgd)
$0.00 $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 $3.00 $3.50 $4.00// $10.00
Unit Cost($/1,000 gallons)
Data Source: CCUA IWRP Development with CDM Smith
Note: CCUA's IWRP efforts with CDM Smith are still on-going and being developed. The concepts discussed are not in final form. 10
\..____C. ‘''..' 11.41111.:4 1111 1'.....)14°.SL .......t." ..2.....
(F----- .4 -s•
Er-
C
.....,F
a mita
--
....\ ' 7.-
Improvement
��
Program t , -
,...
r
__..,_.
:__ , ._
WOW ! THAT STUFF IS EXPENSIVE ! 1F :_' i EX"'BIT'A"
a. n
-!e,
ems, 1 - ' p, r�_7 •,a'
0 .o n o ,.2 .L . R'10: . `JIP I r
11
Plant Expansions and Major Upgrades
1 r, —
. ` . � Plants (New, Expanded, Upgraded)
Plant Name
�"`i MEADOWBROOK
RIDGECREST . ' WTP
WTP .A y--
� �'�' ISLArJD PEENIN WRF G Through Through
' ;� -
-7 , FY 24 FY27
MID-CLAY WRFx
iliddialA Yy Peters Creek WRF $43.5 M $0.3 M
SARATOGA
MEADOWLAKES WrPI- SPRifJGS WTP Peters Creek WTP $5 M
St John -
` m Saratogo Springs WTP & WRF $16.66 M -
Lill
WRF
m PETERS8 CREEKWTP Governor's Park WTP $p,8 M $0.V M
MidClayWWTP $7.2 M -
GOVERt GOVERNOR'S
. PARK WTP Fleming Island BCR $7.2 M -
•• al WTP $4.3 M -
to
lb . Meadow Lakes WTP $3.1 M -
, '• i�s Ridgecrest WTP $2 M -
KEYSTONE•
HEIGHTS ' Keystone Heights WTP - $7. 1 M
Putnam Total Major Costs Items $98 M $8 M
Data Source: CCUA's Proposed Capital Improvement Program Budget for Fiscal Year 2022/2023
12
Note: CCUA's Proposed Capital Improvement Program Budget is subject to change.
Major Pipelines to meet growth and address resiliency
gi, kri,:,,, '"vg. '.i , :� ,i. air
Le•end `�" `4° ��l'i,'
• County / Bonded Trans. Projects ;F'-f.� '`, 441
New Growth Support Projects .y!*. .' s
Resiliency and Reliability Projects i kik' = �� `�,
• _.......„
it A,: it 04,.
, :,...,, ..., „„11 ..:.._.,,,,
MIA/11 nM
.R�. ,,,,,,EMT'A f1z_ r VI r?i.
ti
1 fr.
CCUA Draft 5 Year Cost Breakdown ° "
Major Cost Items FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 FY27 Total 4,„..,,.� !
J
. .,
....,„ . •
tO Major Pipelines (Growth, j�' 6
Coordination &Resiliency) $20.6 M $13.8 M $4.7 M $4.7 M $2.5 M $49 M
4116,
(IF 6
4
cr..n Cov
Scorings
P•nn.y .\
Farms 'J
Data Source: CCUA's Proposed Capital Improvement Program Budget for Fiscal Year 2022/2023
13
Note: CCUA's Proposed Capital Improvement Program Budget is subject to change.
Capital Improvement Program Short-term Snapshot
CCUA Draft 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan
CIP Budget Year L FY23 I FY24
Proposed CIP Budget I $115,687,147 I $72,438,531
Draft CCUA 5 Year Cost Breakdown
Major Cost Items FY23 FY24
* Lift Station R&R $5,167,500 $2,862,000
* Plants (New, Expanded, Upgraded) $55,339,094 $24,686,651
* Major Pipelines (Growth, Coordination& Resiliency) $20,570,000 $13,846,000
* Plant Electrical Upgrades $831,176 $3,748,125
* Alternative Water Supply $7,002,000 $4,322,000
* Buildings $6,989,608 $3,950,000
to
Total Major Cost Items $95,899,378 $53,414,776 _ COU�
Percent of CIP 83% 74% � \
Remaining Budget Items $19,787,769 $19,023,755
Contingency $11,568,715 $7,243,853 /l/ `�
' UTH�
Total CIP $127,255,862 $79,682,384
Data Source: CCUA's Proposed Capital Improvement Program Budget for Fiscal Year 2022/2023
14
Note: CCUA's Proposed Capital Improvement Program Budget is a draft and subject to change.
y AUTN
Rate Stud
611'4
HOW ARE WE GOING TO PAY FOR
EVERYTHING ?
15
1 ,, ,
Policy Goals „ It 0) .:11..„ klii
-/, __ ,,, ,, --:, -,.4�~
7 , .,..
Equity -
_ *-4: ier--- .- — .
vertical and horizontal
' ''- - ..'---'''''•-1 4*:_-
Simplicity - —
administratively and M i i_ 1 w••1 w•ota i••...%...•0•i•0•0....,v:.i••.•s 0• ...,,..•0....••..0.; ,....•.,;it...,,•;,--•--'"."""----"'"-.---":_,....,,,,,-.,.,, ,,,
for customers
- _...... /10011111._..d .7.100.11
to
Revenue stability ,1, ,, . illLk/li
���NI co UNT`` \j,
�.
CBI
am, ♦ /,`�
A
Policy Goals May Influence <%. ,,,....(,-/co, -<.11 -
PIA09/4. - - 1.--:. 414114-
Water conservation "•� _
- _
rallr
,' rilit,4. :-. ..i -, ,
rf. 1
.. : . .),
Different development '
classes
Residential
Commercial - * liFik .
Commercial Irrigation .4"
Relief tied to essential ; •
'
cv
y cov uses of water •
A . 1LL
CCUA's Total Water Use Make- up
Total All Customer Accounts All Customer Account Potable Water Use
12 Month Rolling Average 12 Month Rolling Average
4.2212.98% 12.69%
21.65% 9.77%
1 billi
411P16
51.12%
to 1 71.15%
26.42%
mmilli
��,y
• Tier 1 Tier 2 • Tier 3 • Tier 4 L covNr ■ Tier 1 Tier 2 ■ Tier 3 ■ Tier 4
Data Source: CCUA Demand Frequency by Tier Analysis % 4 ‘'t\
/TYAUTIA° 18
CCUA's Rates Remain Competitive rm.' 1
:, ' \v,'Y
Y AUTN
Clay County Utility Authority
Illustrative Monthly Utility Bill Comparisons at Various Usage Levels
-Residential Water and Sewer Customer Served by a 5/8 x 3/4 Meter-
Utility Average Thousands of Gallons per Month
3 6 10 15
CCUA* $85.46 $52.50 _ $68.43 $99.03 $121.88
Green Cove Springs $94.73 $46.91 $74.60 $107.52 $149.87
Town of Orange Park $95.24 $57.12 $77.02 $106.92 $139.88
JEA _ $96.11 $52.61 $73.03 $107.02 $151.79
St.Johns County $104.16 $55.91 $82.64 $120.60 $157.50
to GRU $103.19 $46.64 $76.64 $118.55 $170.93
ECUA $115.74 $53.21 $87.32 $132.79 $189.64
*Calculations include rates effective 10/01/2021
Median $96.11 $52.61 $76.64 $107.52 $151.79
Mean $99.23 $52.13 $77.10 $113.20 $154.50
19
Data Source: CCUA's adopted Fiscal Year 2021/2022 Budget
Challenges and
Opportunities
ro-u,
Challenges and Opportunities
Regulatory Workforce Development
New regulations being developed Challenges
Minimum Flows and Levels People leaving the utility workforce
faster than those entering
Potable Reclaimed Water
7-1 Competition of state licensed operators
Forever Chemicals
Opportunities
Scale and costs of these regulations
are currently unknown Implemented grow and develop our own
approach
may`• '`:e v_ 1 }' `y' �- J
to 4 ,� �4,: ,A. High School Internship Program
s� . = i t? _ f--- Training and Incentive Program
L �� CO(I,Vy
r
�` Increased wages
//If • a i - rani
4
..
s%. I , .• �'�/rYAUTNO�`�
21
` l
00.1
/en
• ) AunA0
to Thank you
JEREMY D . JOHNSTON , MBA , PE
22