HomeMy WebLinkAboutLAMPA Presentation 00,
4::::' Dewberry®
1.11,
LAKE ASBURY MASTER PLAN AREA ( LAMPA)
TRUNK MAIN CAPITAL COST RECOVERY POLICY
Clay County Utility Authority
Board of Supervisors
December 20, 2022
Lake Asbury Master Plan Area ( LAM PA
Background
W*E
S
Adopted November 2006 ; 30 , 000+ acres7 ,,%'
I :Fa)... *
a 7e e4 !1
First Coast Expressway ( and A-, }
.a
. c-,- ! ,-- %.\-4.
Cathedral Oak Parkway `•��e ��
will drive immediate development te,t - ' .. •.- c, - 4,� Atli
Opportunity to cost-effectively pioneer
.
utilitytrunk lines I.-
i ARK Y Roa e F. mI LULAAr
'�..G.-Dem zowq Enn)
____Future Roads
— FonCRoxxM -U YRrP
C
-LA.
Rai Rose U:OL
—Card eov,an LA VC
----Peters Cr...eaarest Dye raore,rn -LA AC
uwapa saran' -U rvc
�__� Ya{te.pin eoewn ��
was -U cw
-RP
..ea4e.-1'ii 1
2040 Lake Asburyfg Future Land Use Map __ _
Lake Asbury Master Plan Area ( LAMPA)
Engineering Report
Projected ERCs based on future land uses and allowable
densities
Low, Medium and High values per net acre
"Immediate benefitting areas" = developable acreage
Identified optimal connections and alignments
Hydraulic model used to size trunk mains for build-out
Estimated total capital costs by utility and corridor
Apportioned (pro rata) cost per ERC based on Medium densities
3 V' Dewberry
W.
Lake AsburyMaster Plan ' - ;
Area (LAMPA) ,,, _, E
Target Corridors and '= `Al
Plant Improvements
{•� db� }: -' • � �
R Mid-Clay WRF
Water Treatment Plants - � z a�, ' ,w
. Er • Saratoga Springs WTP&RPF '>�\ .,
Meadow Lake Meadow Lake WTP (online in 202.) \? ' 4
Saratoga Springs t ' o r Peters Creek °� . k , - as, �, _,� /it.
Wastewater Reclamation Facilities -_ '�
+
Mid-Clay 'i' 1' Peters Creek WRF : ?`� v--"ki4
'" (online in 2024)
Peters Creek ' -�-'`
Reclaimed Water Facilities ,� Peters Creek WTP ` ,`.
a. .., ... ,re \ I ,ate
Mid Clay � rr...._Stew load dE W Peen" 'rms
met
Saratoga Springs - 1•
.
In LAMPA Boundary CORRIDOR N ,,,
Peters Creek First Coast Expressway CATHEDRAL OAK PKWY PROJECT C z,
CORRIDOR 1 _ _•
iD CORRIDOR 2
4 - CR 218 EXTENSION PROJECT N.T.S.
A, 1
• fa,* • es* if
FLU •Estimated Directly Estimated Total Capital a*-" i t i • t LEGEND
benefitting Developable Improvements per Eke - r> >i •,per; la .ANFWE�xrda:y
Density p •f1 , r' du�
Area Total ERCs6,564 $ ERC5885 -
t ' • Me Densty `
11))
MED 8,897 5653 ur / •i4, 8g a
prod0 P
HIGH 24 746 IM=MINIM t _4.4F - 12.
4 Iiiiilarit , r J )
I
r, at crated Drectly
S .• \, i -- ,A 32remtlrg
lintDe'.HV_Atea
Firs.Coast
F F = `- ''essa'ay
" '� Future Land Use
�j�• 4 5 EACa IGC 6bC s SU ERCe '
"FT" 317 Ef�Ce 342 E RCe• 416 Nal �f}�1 - + LA AC
ll;t��' 194 ERCa ;- ) 1�ik a + •
LA GA'
_` 334 M - 224-- \..j ' ERat• - LA RF
�d LA RC
-/ ..--..) -., t." :4 - ' - :-.`-7-‘
•�.. i_.► • - —r T.
111.4
' } I 1.
223 EROS • •
I
,`__L_Ii•-__i:- , I 1
. _
. _ :....,
or - . .
,ip. _
- , , 0. ' r ••
401.
l�'GrV
. • li •..
iwio • ti . 1
•�•
o t.000 z000 LAKE ASBURY MASTER PLAN AREA
4.-* J ® Dewberry N�y r Fee F;tu�?Land Use oerCla)Court),Flonoa1oo.-X22, TRUNK LINE CAPITAL COST RECOVERY POLICY•'�..' t r -=coo•eK ►u�euu'r Race La!1d Use oen&roee n EXHIBIT B 1: POTABLE WATER
FLU Estimated Directly Estimated Total Capital (?i i f .~ 7� Ni
LEGEND
Density ia
BenefittingDevelopable ImprovementsperERA in LAP 6oi,iiary
le
Area otal ERCs $/ERC . _ %
'
LOW 6,564 S1207 b;i11/4:6. .e ' • BRCSMedi JEr�MED 8 897 89Ce x V.
M ' Proposed RCW*Ie
HIGH 24 746 $320 /
-.:'..RF , e fl _i 12.
' 116V . 16-
.„ PIZI ! ' I T ' FP, - Enated D+ By
- - - ( L r De eMUf�
_ C, "-/ DEvHDN Area
�.IflrtCrt
Lam' 4C5IENCs +� Evressisay
cu`: •I • sakziux 41C ' � -' h*ite Land Use
f 1 �y ~ 4 1 ERCa
\~� „, . �„� r lam. LAM v
;" I— . . _,
334 EfiCI,4___k \.....224 i'. r -' di LA MPC
�1r-- , ,
+ , 2,�ER.
`�_ -` 1,129D ERCe �, LA RC
t� • !'� I. -'r l LA RP
�'�I --•...-- f/P. .f.T.; . ,
-r ` f LA11'C
‘04..._-& . .
15
L- ,,'. 4,04./4 41101.111 . .
c ,'LI:.(_i_',_.;:._ illiairma
MOB _ ,.{a
e, Ilk. 4 ii.
tP
IL. . .
. t t
...
. 1. .,..
. 1 . _ 41p, ‘.
0 1.000 z0o0 NOTE. LAKE ASBURY MASTER PLAN AREA
Dewberry u * r Few Five.Land L der.0lay Courry.Rolla Iva-21= TRUNK LINE CAPITAL COST RECOVERY POLICY
.1J 1 nal'2.c00'EC l' U1 i 'F�ue L31c pie'De1sles`'t'}"^ EXHIBIT B-2: RECLAIMED WATER
•
FLU Estimated Directly Lst,mated Total Capital ' - ."� LEGEND
tienefitting Developable Improvements per ERC ' • •• ' s �. el Density A }- II `�' �
Area(Total ERCs) ($/ERC) • _ S/ ' - 1, it Proposed FMB
t 9,034 51,087 . \
h't..' 12.190 S805 t o o oHIGH 34,627 $28s4\....
t\ __ .'i. 10•
I , LA RFC J ' hk 12'
v 10
;ram : ) �
..�, w L�N r�• • � 2.•
•
• ,.a► _ a Meduri Density
F- ER
OS
- - -"-= .r►' jy 3 _ )GCS
I Ifi5 ER Cs //1 f •
it 446 ERCs` • ti54 :-• ESL1iated Directly
• 337 ERC ,� • , 342 E7OCs gig EiiCs •• • J /� / *w 82 g
�`• _ • ts4 ES Ca % 1ir!" j( _- , • Deretcp. e Area
10 ♦ CP +~'�4 Q2CE ..i,a . .. ' `vJ �I•„ � Fat Coast
��`- 334 ERCa N. ' 6�fE667t�y
/ u� z_) 1 r „•• *5:_ -,,„„_.2( ,,,;,._i____I--/ f-- /% $i/':.' -•,,,,
4-1- -r-i- 11
mil_
FuRiro LAM
UN
l itCs ; �— ,J LAAiC
LA GiAl
1 {ice// (\--
I ,�, , LA IOC
- t 'i "rn_, a
J uRC
— i. 1r LARF
L- �, 1 a. _
11( ''' a ar ( .1 1''.
�C. L.
New projects
l ,. identified
, , ,-,...m.it -C . . - .
isA through
ollio-- Imodeling
diallial .
a 1. a 2.403 NOTE: LAKE ASBURY MASTER PLAN AREA
� Dewberry a F Fee! Future Land Use:. ClayCourty Florida(Vo:-X: TRUNK LINE CAPITAL COST RECOVERY POLICY
t h;'1-2.400'eet Nledurr Future Lana Use Densroes Storm EXHIBIT B-': WASTEWATER
s
Lake Asbury Master Plan Area ( LAM PA
Estimated Capital Costs
EST. CAPITAL COST TOTAL EST. 3 _ 'e, 1
CORRIDOR UTILITY BY UTILITY CAPITAL COST BY 4 . :.F , s _- =`, "-1 _
,':
(incl.20%contingency) SEGMENT i. i .,
Potable Water $2,044,000 wmpo _ '
_1 _: . :II
CR 218 Extension (green) Reclaimed Water $3,956,000 $7 781 ,000 Y'
Wastewater $1,781 ,000 - +'
_:.
Potable Water $2,939,000 , . ' , , n.
Corridor 1 (red) $5,878.000
Reclaimed Water _ $2,939,000 3 iiles-s),, ,
. i
. ,_
Potable Water $1,301,000 Ix
Corridor 2 (black) $2,602.000
Reclaimed Water $1,301,000
.
Potable Water $314,000 " ..
Cathedral Oak Parkway �,� a•�.F i t -`
Reclaimed Water $314,000 $3,997.000 - :�_.'� . '"
(blue) r , .,,,'T 1
Wastewater $3,369,000 • In LAMPABoundary CORRIDOR N .
First Coast Expressway�•CATHEDRAL OAK PKWY PROJECT
CR 315/PETERS CREEK SPUR
f uu CORRIDOR 1
CR 315 / Peters Creek Spur v —CORRIDOR 2 N.T.S. 1 -I
(orange) Wastewater $5,376.000 $5,376,000 CR 218EXTENSION PROJECT
Ti. 1 € f :e
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST: $25,634,000 iiiP Dewberry
Lake Asbury Master Plan Area ( LAMPA)
Cost per ERC by Utility
UTILITYTOTAL EST. % APPORTIONED ERCS* COST PER
COST APPORTIONED COST (ROUNDED) ERC
Potable Water $65987OOO 88% $5,807,000 8,897 S653
Reclaimed Water $8;51OOOO 93% $7.915OOO 8,897 S890
Wastewater** $ 1O,526.000 93% $9.817OOO 12,190 S805
* ERCs represent the Medium density values
** Wastewater apportioned cost calculation accounts for portions of Cathedral
Oak Pkwy and CR 315 that will accept flow from outside LAMPA.
9 Dewberry
hIPe Dewberry®
ito
Questions ?
Lake Asbury Master Plan Area (LAMPA) Trunk Main Capital Cost Recovery Policy
Clay County Utility Authority
Board of Supervisors
December 20, 2022
hIPe Dewberry®
ito
Questions ?
Lake Asbury Master Plan Area (LAMPA) Trunk Main Capital Cost Recovery Policy
Clay County Utility Authority
Board of Supervisors
December 20, 2022