HomeMy WebLinkAboutShadowlawn-CCUA Interlocal 111 Dewberry®
Review of Revisions to the Proposed
LAMPA Trunk Main Capital Cost Recovery
Policy and Engineering Report
Marcy Cook, Dewberry
CCUA Board of Supervisors, 8/15/2023
Lake Asbury Master Plan Area ( LAMPA)
Trunk Main Engineering Report Updates
Added ERCs in vicinity of Shadowlawn Elementary
Recalculated capital cost apportionment based on additional flows
Updated capital costs for CR 218 Extension with bid prices
Updated estimated capital costs based on current industry trends
Recalculated Costs per ERC
Public rate hearing scheduled for September 12
Board consideration on September 19
2 V' Dewberry
Lake Asbury Master Plan Area ( LAM PA Updated Estimated Capital Costs
EST. CAPITAL COST TOTAL EST. CAPITA rl - ''-
CORRIDOR UTILITY BY UTILITY COST BY SEGMENT 6%e� s ":- 1"-1, �., a
(incl.20%contingency) • {,� .4
Potable Water $3,013,525.85 € _._
CR 218 Extension (green) $9201,915.57
Reclaimed Water $4,679,021.28 --actual--, Y
Wastewater $1,509,368.44
Potable Water $3,567.600 .y
Corridor 1 (red) - $7,135,200
Reclaimed Water $3,567,600
ri r,^ m
Potable Water $1,579,200 t : I ! -s ,
Corridor 2 (black) $3,158,400 •
Reclaimed Water $1,579.200 ` ti',
Potable Water $380,400wow
1 Pe'xeY Farrs ` { . ��••l.l
Cathedral Oak Parkway (blue) Reclaimed Water $380,400 $4,851,600 wr . ;,
@�
LAMPA Boundary CORRIDOR •
Wastewater $4,O9O,SOO ` CATHEDRAL OAK PKWY PROJECT N `
First Coast Expressway I
CR 315/PETERS CREEK SPUR
f CORRIDOR 1
-New Segment- . -CORRIDOR 2 N TS
CR 315 r Peters Creek Spur Wastewater $6,528,000 $6,528,000 CR 218 EXTENSION PROJECT
TOTAL ESTIMATED UNAPPORTIONED COST: $30,875,115.57 iiiP Dewberry
Lake Asbury Master Plan Area ( LAM PA Updated Costper ERC by Utility
UTILITY TOTAL APPORTIONED
°As APPORTIONED ERCs* COST PER ERC
ESTIMATED COST COST (rounded)
Potable Water $8,540,725.85 92% $7.858,000 9,364 $839
Reclaimed Water $10.206.221 .28 98% S10,003.000 9.364 $1 ,068
Wastewater** $12.128.168.44 Approx. 93% $11 .270.000 12.657 $890
$30,875,115.57 $29,131 ,000 $2,798
* ERCs represent the Medium density values
** Wastewater apportioned cost calculation accounts for portions of Cathedral Oak Pkwy and CR 315 that
will accept flow from outside LAMPA.
4 V Dewberry
Lake Asbury Master Plan Area ( LAM PA Trunk Main Engineering Report Updates
Original UPDATED Original UPDATED Original UPDATED
UTILITY ERCs ERCs Apportion % APPORTION % Cost per COST PER INCREAS L
ERC ERC
Potable Water 8,897 9,364 88% 92% $653 $839 29%
Reclaimed Water 8,897 9,364 92% 98% $890 $1 .068 20%
Wastewater 12, 190 12,657 Approx. 93% Approx. 93% $805 $890 11
$2,348 $2.798 19%
5 iiiP Dewberry
*,6 i. n - 1 - VC., IbIll t.All i tt 'p.»' n •,
FLU Estimated Directly Estimated Total Capital a S 47 • J� % LEGEFID .
Density •
Benefitting Developable Improvements per ERCeir LAA1PABoundary
Area Total ERCs $ ERC ~a"
't? .ii �` • Medium Density
LOW 6,897 $1,139 ^• ERCs
MED 9 364 $839 t Proposed PWMs
HIGH 26,015 5302 ram. LARF ..... 12^^rr�.
!( - - � ti. • l rya -t
: ,$"
°=s` _ �i Estimated Directly
#�'11114111111111 12" in Benefitting
s �m ti49 ERCs -.' Developable Area
r— `' F First Coast
Y.11i� , , 1 • Expressway
..0 • Future Land Use
T' 387 ERGS x —.- :.' =' a- 81 ERCs.. LA AC
.,
LA GW
21
•
• LAMPC
:`_ ZGT
�� ` 273 ERCs`' / 1
°• 333E• , � `1\ =_-,_.' .:'''s 'li,/,';'' �" '!,�ti=-�r��' LA RF
, 4..\\ 395 ERCs LA VC
ll
it r_
/41,A239 ERCs vl ._ -
' .T
1191P.
r
n C1
•
t. --• ‘ Vitt,.. . ...
LA G W glEgia IME1 1 - 77 \t-41,-°t;
A r"1
• . -- .. 4. 41
, .� 3 1,000 2,000 NOTE: LAKE ASBURY MASTER PLAN AREA
a Dewberry w*t --Feet Future Land Use per Clay County.Florida(Nov-2022) TRUNK LINE CAPITAL COST RECOVERY POLICY
1 incr,=2C33 feet Medium Future Land Use Densities Shown EXHIBIT B-1: POTABLE WATER
FLU Estimated Directly Estimated Total Capital , - - - f 4 , - LEGEND
rdln J
BenefittingDevelopable Improvementsper ERC *-: LAMPABoundar
P P tit y
b. Density Area Total ERCs ERC '"` �y T'- 0
+. �'!Y ► It _ Medium Density f
LOW 6,897 $1,450 : °, t � ^ - = •
ERCs
MED 9 364 $1,068 f; Proposed RCWMs
HIGH 26 015 $385 If
-- -. I . �F ; J
f • I 16"
r -iris
12. ` , , gY // ' •■ 20"
110
• 849 ERCs 1.2 Estimated Directly
` {' - - Benefitting
1 ti r �J ('A Developable Area
11,.z p First Coast
r,41 12; l-' Expressway
ti- 'F'3'37 ERCs "`" \,r Future Land Use
+ 1yERE,.
LA AC
- _. 194 ERCs
�, s T` I :- LA GW
— _, ec? �/, •
LA MPC
213E• s +.+ •r_ LA RC
/ ,
433 E•Ki % swei -•✓
a /: LA RF
467 ERCs 5r 1 vim* V. s /27/////,/, ''.
e!4 / LA VC
illE yi 223 ERCs r _ I Lr�
till.taktikb*
% y
/� 239 • - i,i —
7'.
1141
. L7.-t . Allilipl—
T • LTAt,+
���`' _ , -
allt ilitw... 1
�%�' �` 3 1,000 2.000 NOTE: LAKE ASBURY MASTER PLAN AREA
1 i 1 'lit Dewberry w , , --Feet Future Land Use per Clay County Florida(Nov-2022) TRUNK LINE CAPITAL COST RECOVERY POLICY
�1�'„ ,!`/ y 1 ;nco=2 000 feet Medium Future Land Use Densities Shown EXHIBIT B-2: RECLAIMED WATER
1 FLU Estimated Directly Estimated Total Capital i_•_ , . _ LEGEND
Benefitting Developable Improvements per ERC r-•�",f� 1 `' el LAMPABoundary
Density • _��[� ..
Area Total ERCs ERC • rliS �r
1R,` ` iiii Proposed FMs
• D �� S .r `' •.u• 6' M
r MED 12 657 $890 /�///i';.: ♦ •
10"
,ivaliiiii
ribei
HIGH 35 896 $314 - /7•
LA RFsii /� . . 12"
r
. . ri:
16"
• / ' ; ~' Tm
Density
7 . ;__�Anc _ // /,/
\ - i �� Estimated Drectly
\--- ,!
3a/ ERCs'" a^, 4 Benefiting
- 0
r • Developable Area s
_ / ` y First Coast t
•
r /^ ' ) Ca-F�iiiL3
Expressway
333 ERCs _ _ Future Land Use
46 Cs 4,1 tiY��r„ 1 i _ di LA AC 1
di LAGW
1 LAMPC
/'_', , l LA RC
• �•. . t G� xpe.4 i T.
LA RF 1
1 :. -__
7
J
_ . . ,,,,I,
ii), ,
. .
.. ' LA VC
,,,_,
..,
4-- ; 1:-1 . — -1! -).Sik . K.'41.1/I
er
‘ i ... � � �•
N� ° 1,200 2.400 NOTE LAKE ASBURY MASTER PLAN AREA
.o , 0 Dewberry ' F Feet 1 Future Land Use per Clay County.Florida(Nov-2022) TRUNK LINE CAPITAL COST RECOVERY POLICY
1 inch=2,400feet Medium Future Land Use Densities Shown EXHIBIT B-3: WASTEWATER
s